1.) Skinner, Watson & Rounds, P.C.
http://www.sswlegal.com
2.) Dozier Internet Law
http://www.cybertriallawyer.com
3.)Kring & Chung Attorneys, L.L.P
http://www.kringandchung.com
4.)Michael P Kimbrell
http://www.michaelpkimbrelllaw.com
5.)John Peter Lee, Ltd.
http://www.johnpeterlee.com
6.)Weide and Miller, Ltd
http://www.weidemiller.com
7.)McDonald-Carano-Wilson
http://www.mcdonaldcarano.com
8.)Snell and Wilmer
http://lawyers.justia.com/firm/snell-wilmer-14159
9.)Kostiw Law Group, PC
http://www.rockstarlaw.com
10.)Weiss & Moy, P.C.
http://www.weissiplaw.com
www.weidemiller.com
Thursday, November 18, 2010
Week 7 & EOC: Intellectual Property Questions
1. Shooting on private and public property. Where is the line drawn between the two?
2. If the property is private, what right does the owner of the property have to throw you off the property for taking photographs?
3. Do celebrities and other public figures give up their rights to privacy in exchange for fame and fortune?
4. In design, how much of a percentage of change do two similar products have to be in order to avoid a lawsuit?
5. A fashion designer leaves a company and takes a large portion of the company’s clientele. Can the parent company sue?
6. What are the limits for #5?
7. Righthaven. Is forcing people to give up their Web Domains for posting another websites material legal? How much of a right do they have?
8. Can any image be trademarked?
9. Reusing a logo. How much credit do you have to give to the original designer?
10. How much of a song can you use before it is copyright infringement?
2. If the property is private, what right does the owner of the property have to throw you off the property for taking photographs?
3. Do celebrities and other public figures give up their rights to privacy in exchange for fame and fortune?
4. In design, how much of a percentage of change do two similar products have to be in order to avoid a lawsuit?
5. A fashion designer leaves a company and takes a large portion of the company’s clientele. Can the parent company sue?
6. What are the limits for #5?
7. Righthaven. Is forcing people to give up their Web Domains for posting another websites material legal? How much of a right do they have?
8. Can any image be trademarked?
9. Reusing a logo. How much credit do you have to give to the original designer?
10. How much of a song can you use before it is copyright infringement?
Thursday, November 4, 2010
Week 5 EOC-Lawyers Looking For Fame
What makes me angry in this situation is that they make this guy out to be an all around good guy. What they fail to mention is that Humberto got deported several times and re-entered the United States illegally. The thing with the lawyers from the New York Times in the article,” Specialists’ help at court can come with a catch,” dated October 9, 2010, by Adam Liptak, kind of does not surprise me. A lawyer, wanting a case that may very well go before the Supreme Court makes me makes me wonder whether the lawyer was in it for himself. If he was in it for the client initially, why would it matter who represented him in the court session?
If Humberto was deported for being here illegally the first time then escaped deportation the second time, or even third, by being arrested, there should have been no contest with the court system that the status of becoming an American Citizen did not change. In the Court Opinion provided by Cornell University of Law by the Justice Souter, http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct ,it claims that an immigrant may have rights against him if he leaves and comes back illegally. This was completely a showboat opportunity for the lawyer in question. He saw the unique opportunity to claim his right to fame by going before the Supreme Court in handling this case whether it won or not he could get his name in the papers, the court system as an immigrant lawyer etc. What a shameful way to go public with your own interests in mind. Meanwhile a child may never see his father again due to the greed and corruption of the mind of that lawyer. This is a ridiculous way to move up in the world. However the man should not be allowed back in the country until he is given that right.
If Humberto was deported for being here illegally the first time then escaped deportation the second time, or even third, by being arrested, there should have been no contest with the court system that the status of becoming an American Citizen did not change. In the Court Opinion provided by Cornell University of Law by the Justice Souter, http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct ,it claims that an immigrant may have rights against him if he leaves and comes back illegally. This was completely a showboat opportunity for the lawyer in question. He saw the unique opportunity to claim his right to fame by going before the Supreme Court in handling this case whether it won or not he could get his name in the papers, the court system as an immigrant lawyer etc. What a shameful way to go public with your own interests in mind. Meanwhile a child may never see his father again due to the greed and corruption of the mind of that lawyer. This is a ridiculous way to move up in the world. However the man should not be allowed back in the country until he is given that right.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)